I Agree?


No one really reads the terms and conditions connected to every website they visit, phone call they make or app they download. After watching this provocative exploration of what actually lies between the lines of those tiny-font agreements, however, you may just hurl your computer out the window and take to a cave.

A mere click of the mouse is all it takes for you to strike an almost Faustian bargain with one of the mega corporations on the planet. With that click we get access to fantastic email service, genius music players and easy-to-use photo editors. But what do the companies providing us with these seemingly free services get in return? Or, as director Cullen Hoback promptly asks in his film Terms And Conditions May Apply: ” What if privacy policies weren’t about protecting privacy but about taking it away?”

Hoback is a documentarin and investigator in the vein of Michael Moore, putting himself front and center in the film as our fluent narrator and guide through what can often be labyrinthine subject matter. Unlike Moore, Hoback is a far more focused presence, without an ounce of snark in him. The brevity of his questions and concerns are not totally lost to grim seriousness as there is a degree of humor to the film, albeit of an almost Orwellian intonation.

The tale he delivers is of the digital age; of our post 9/11 world where a comedian can find an NYC SWAT at his door because he made a bad joke on Facebook, or an anthropology professor in the U.K. can be arrested and detained for merely “thinking about the act of protest”. Hoback asks early on in his film: “What if the data collection the patriot act required became a whole new business model, and a whole new foundation of the internet as we know it?” Cleverly illustrating that question and its many follow-ups is a bevy of clips including choice moments from South Park The Lives Of Others, Minority Report and plenty of C-Span (Al Franken included).

In the first half Hobeck focuses on how companies like Google, Apple or Facebook may use the data you provide them, laying the groundwork for an investigation that only blows wide from there. While the film doesn’t reveal any truths we may not already know without a little investigation of our own (or understanding of our constitutional rights), it does expertly sync up, contextualize and give us a startling picture of the big picture of our current global climate; at times a history of the moment, in turn an autopsy report on the still oozing corpse of privacy.  Hobeck speaks with senators, attorneys, a VP at Mozilla, musician Moby, author Margaret Atwood and over a dozen technology analysts, consumer advocates, security experts, government whistle blowers and software engineers. He scours for traces of Google’s earliest privacy policies, chronicles the demise of online privacy acts post 9/11, chats with Barret Brown the unofficial head of the hacktivist collective Anonymous, and deconstructs the meanings behind data collecting and how the government could use the terms and service agreements we sign with companies to help solidify the state of surveillance we live in. Going further and further down the rabbit hole, coming out the other side it all feels a little less like 1984 and more like Fahrenheit 451. As Sherry Turkle, professor of social studies of business and technology at MIT puts it in the final third of the film: “I am not exactly sure who the us is, but I am very critical of us.”

WATCH the trailer HERE


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s